noreen
SF Bay Area

Join noreen on tribe.net today!

noreen has invited you to join her at Tribe.net.

Nearly 30% of US families subsist on poverty wages

topic posted Thu, October 16, 2008 - 3:25 AM by  Unsubscribed
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
“Working Poor” report: Nearly 30 percent of US families subsist on poverty wages
By Tom Eley
16 October 2008

www.wsws.org/articles/20...rk-o16.shtml

A report released Tuesday by the Working Poor Families Project reveals that more than 28 percent of American families with one or both parents employed are living in poverty.

The report, “Still Working Hard, Still Falling Short,” is based on data for the period from 2004 through 2006 gathered from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey and the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey.

The report finds that 9.6 million households can be described as low-income or “working poor”—defined as families that earn less than 200 percent of the official poverty level. There were 350,000 more such families in 2006 than in 2002. More than 21 million children now live in low-income working families—an increase of 800,000 in four years.

In 2006 there were more than 29 million jobs in the US that paid below the official poverty level—defined as $9.91 an hour for full-time labor—an increase of nearly 5 million poverty-wage jobs from 2002.

Family income inequality also increased rapidly between 2002 and 2006, the report says. In 2006, the top 20 percent of US households earned on average 9.2 times as much as the bottom quintile.

The report notes that working poor families “lack the earnings necessary to meet their basic needs—a struggle exacerbated by soaring prices for food, gas, health and education.” About 60 percent of low-income working families are forced to spend more than one-third of their income on housing, and nearly 40 percent lack health insurance for one or both parents.

These families struggle under poverty conditions despite parents working long hours. According to the report, “Adults in low-income working families worked on average 2,552 hours per year in 2006, the equivalent of almost one-and-a-quarter full-time workers.”

This total is about one third of all the hours that pass in a year. It is nearly twice the total yearly work hours of the average German worker, who works 1,362 hours per week, and 162 hours more per year than the average South Korean worker, according to statistics from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

The report documents the sharp decline in living standards for wide layers of the working class, the result of decades of corporate downsizing and wage-cutting presided over by Democratic and well as Republican administrations. It shows that poverty-level jobs are increasingly common and are held by broad sections of the population. Contrary to certain stereotypes promoted by the media, the majority of families living on poverty wages are neither immigrants, minorities or families with a single parent.

Some 72 percent of poor families, according to the report, hold jobs. More than half are headed by married couples, 69 percent have only American-born parents, 89 percent have a parent between the ages of 25 and 54, and 43 percent have white non-Hispanic parents. Only 25 percent receive food stamp assistance.

The study breaks its statistics down to the state level. In general, the conditions of working families are worst in the South and the non-Pacific West. Texas, for example, has the fourth highest number of working families defined as low-income, the second lowest percentage of low-income families who have a high school diploma or its equivalent, the second highest number with no post-secondary school experience, the fewest with health insurance, and the third highest family income inequality.

New York has the highest family income inequality in the nation, California the fourth highest.

The impoverishment of ever-larger sections of the working class population is the outcome of a number of processes: the dismantling of large sections of basic industry, the wave of union-busting and strike-breaking in the 1980s, the gutting of social welfare programs, the betrayal of the working class by the trade union organizations.

The other side of this process is the vast enrichment of the top 10 percent of the US population and the ever-greater concentration of wealth in the hands of the financial elite.

A survey carried out in March by Equilar and reported by the New York Times revealed that the CEOs of the 200 largest publicly traded companies earned an average of $11.7 million in 2007.

In 2005, the top 1 percent of US households accounted for 21.8 percent of all pre-tax income, twice the figure in 1970s. This represented the greatest concentration of income since the year before the onset of the Great Depression, 1928, when about 24 percent of national income went to the top percentile.

It should be noted that the “Still Working Hard, Still Falling Short” report reflects conditions that existed prior to the eruption of the financial crisis in August of 2007 and the subsequent slide into recession.
posted by:
Unsubscribed
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Max
    Max
    offline 6
    As a member of the working poor I feel like i have to respond to this, but I'm not really sure what to add. I think that the greatest enemy of the poor is less the upper class and more the ignorance of the middle. People who live in nice houses with yards who never have had their power cut at Christmas or eat ketchup on noodles for breakfast, lunch and dinner will tell me that they are poor. Poor? Hears who you know if your not poor: Do you own a car made in this decade? Can you afford to take sick days? Do you take vacations? If you said "yes" then your probably not poor and you have no clue what it's like to be poor. A few weeks back I met this barbie who tells me that this year she has been to Cancun, Hawaii, and Los Vegas. She also told me that she considered her self poor. Of what I have learned of her seance then I have discovered that both her parents make moderately high levels of money however they were highly invested in the real estate market and now have had to cut back on their spending (but not so much as to keep her form going to Porto Rico next month). How can poverty be addressed if people have such an instantly twisted perception of it's definition?
    • I concur. When I was growing up, I lived in an upper middle class household and thought that I was "liberal" But when I was pushed out of the nest, I had to live with the culture shock of knowing how to live like poor people, and I had still had much thinking from a higher income household.

      I can tell you for sure, that upper and middle income people do not have a clue what poor people have to live through. Why poor people are always in debt, why poverty hurts. The idea that anybody can be rich can't comprehend the glass barriers that make it hard for poor people to advance, such as how malnutrition, culture, upbringing, poor schools, and even the way people inadvertently carry themselves will make it difficult to get to a hire level. Poor people are invisible, living in poor neighborhoods, doing jobs that other people don't see, and a host of other problems make it harder to comprehend for middle and higher income people. Middle and higher income people also don't want to hear about it.
      • Re: Nearly 30% of US families subsist on poverty wages

        Tue, November 18, 2008 - 11:30 PM
        That is almost exactly correct too. I grew up in almost the same situation, when my parents divorced my mom could barley afford house payments... but somehow she made it....i always got made fun of because i would wear clothes from walmart, or because when i bought clothes i would go straight to the clearance section - when the other girls at school would show up with $3,000 purses every few weeks-and brand new hummers and Escalades (then crash them , and have another new car the next day). They dont appreciate the money they have, then they go to expensive colleges, and expensive dorm rooms....ect

        Some of them would show sympathy...but most of them really didn't care.. as long as they had money to spend, and didnt have to work for it. Not to mention-that thick glass barrier....idea.... most of the more wealthy people all have connections! They can always find a good job, because a friend is helping another friend...because they want only the rich to stay rich, and want the poor to stay poor, and that's how its gonna work until this country has a revolution. People dont seem to remember that our country was founded by rebels, and to be a rebel is to be a true american! We fight for our rights, not the government, or the lobbyists...or any of that other bull shit! George Washington WAS A REBEL! HE WAS PRACTICALLY AND ANARCHIST, he wanted the government out of his life, and he just wanted a place to live, where he could-within reason-do what he wanted. Now look at the united states-look at the world! we cant say Vitamin C and golden seal helps relive cold symptoms, or that eating lots of fruit will prevent cancer-all because people are selfish, and dont want people to know the truth...sorry guys im ranting now...im just pissed, because this isnt a democracy... its slavery.
  • George Washington was wealthy. All of the founders of the constitution and the Declaration of Independence were all members of the wealthiest elite of America. They were all slaveowners, all owned property, had servants etc.,. The Revolutionary War was fought for money. Most americans did not want to join in the "Revolutionary" War because most believed that they were not going to be any better off, in fact they even feared that they would be worse off because the greed of the American ruling classes was truly considerable, I mean, shit, they were atheists! "We're not going to go to Hell for being selfish and cruel and greedy! It's all bunk let's have a revolution!" As long as they can get the proletariat to go along with it they'll win, and then screw everybody that helped them and keep it for themselves. It's what they do! They're doing it now with Obama.

    • I disagree with the thought that the atheism of the founding fathers had anything to do with their greed. There are plenty of greedy Christians and I know plenty of atheists who are not greedy. If anything, their atheism helped establish one of the major gains of the American Revolution, the separation of church and state.

      It is true that the gains of the American Revolution were limited to those of a bourgeois nationalist revolution. The wealthy had the power. Likewise, one of the major tasks of the bourgeois revolution, abolition of slavery, had to wait for the Civil War. Yet, kicking the oppressive and exploitive British monarchy out of the United States was still a good thing.

Recent topics in "Poor People's Rights"